Archive for January, 2009

23
Jan
09

The Wolf

From a shoot for the ballet Peter and the Wolf

From a shoot for the ballet Peter and the Wolf

20
Jan
09

World of glass

marbleking_200pa

marbleking_205pa

marbleking_208pa

marbleking_209pa

I was doing some closeup photography of marbles.

19
Jan
09

WV Inauguration Day

2009inauguration_011pa

2009inauguration_022pa

2009inauguration_054pa

01
Jan
09

Flickr/Getty stock biz

Thomas Hawk asks if the Flickr/Getty stock photo program is really going anywhere or not. One of his supposed scenarios is that Getty is really using the partnership to lock-in with Flickr before Microsoft can buy Yahoo and Corbis can get its claws into Flickr.

I personally question whether this is such a great opportunity for the Flickr photographers as he suggests. Right now the stock business sucks for many photographers, and for the stock companies like Getty. Do they really need more images, or just cheaper images, or more photographers willing to provide cheap images – IOW, really good amateurs who don’t need the income?

I’m not a stock photographer, but more folks selling their work cheap because “it’s so cool to be published” is not a good business model.

01
Jan
09

What happens when the portrait studio closes?

Latest news is that Olan Mills in England and Wales will be closing all 34 stores there. I can’t find anything about how healthy the US company is, so don’t run screaming about the portrait studio giant going out of business here.

But the news items all talk about how people in the UK have pre-paid for sittings and may get ripped off for their money. To me, the bigger question is: What happens to all the portraits they’ve already taken and for which they hold the original negatives or files?

Some years ago, my mother called Olan Mills because she had a portrait (marked with their logo) of a deceased sister, and she wanted to get copies. She was told then (about 20 years ago) that they only kept the negatives for two years, and she should just got have it copied. Of course, no commercial place would copy a copyrighted and marked portrait – not to mention the quality of a copy would be pretty poor. The same holds true for today.

I don’t know what today’s policy for Olan Mills, or any other big chain portrait studio (Target? Sears?), is for image retention, nor how to obtain copies later, but that would be the first question I would ask if visiting a large chain. It’s a question easily answered by your local portrait photographer, since s/he is the owner, manager and policy-maker, and the one who can make a decision if you ask to “buy the negative.” Try asking anything of the person that runs the counter at a big chain studio.